Борона с поворотной дисковой секцией
Ключевые слова:
smooth plowing, disc harrow, angle of attack disks, two-factor experiment, response surface, optimization problem
Аннотация
Introduction. At present, there is widely used smooth plowing, which is moldboard plowing without back ridges and deep furrows.
Aim of the Article. The article deals with developing a new design of working tools for smooth soil plowing that ensure the fulfillment of the required quality of soil cultivation.
Materials and Methods. Based on the analysis of existing designs, the authors developed a harrow with a turning disc section, which is characterized by increased operational reliability by reducing energy costs for its adjustment. The range of change in the approach angle of the disk working bodies is 5–45°.
Results. It was found that the speed of movement and the inclination angle disks have the greatest influence on the tillage quality. To optimize the motion parameters with a turning disk section for the best smooth plowing quality, a two-factor experiment was carried out.
Discussion and Conclusion. As a result, it was found that at a speed of 9.113 km/h and approach angle of working disks of 32°, the quality of tillage is maximum and amounts to 86.1%.
Литература
1. Panettieri M., Knicker H., Berns A.E., et al. Moldboard Plowing Effects on Soil Aggregation and Soil Organic Matter Quality Assessed by 13C CPMAS NMR and Biochemical Analyses. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2013;177:48–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.025
2. Shevnikov M., Milenko O., Lotysh I., et al. The Productivity of Soybeans Depending on the Conditions of Moisture Supply to the Soil. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021;9(4):211–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.17
3. Acharya B.S., Dodla S., Gaston L.A., et al. Winter Cover Crops Effect on Soil Moisture and Soybean Growth and Yield under Different Tillage Systems. Soil and Tillage Research. 2019;195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104430
4. Cherenkov A.V., Shevchenko M.S., Gyrka A.D. et al. Increasing the Efficiency of Moisture Resources in Crop Rotation by Tillage Optimization in Ukrainian Steppe Zone. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2021;11(2):35–39. Available at: https://clck.ru/33GrJe (accessed 01.12.2022).
5. Lobachevsky Y.P., Liskin I.V., Panov A.I., et al. Ploughing Quality and Energy Consumption Depending on Plough Bodies Type. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021;1030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1030/1/012154
6. Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Tractor Plough Designing with Specified Tillage Quality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012119
7. Aldoshin N., Kurbanov S., Abdullaev A., et al. Parameters of the Angle-Lift of the Front Plow for Smooth, Rowless Plowing. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021;264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126404042
8. Mamatov F., Aldoshin N., Mirzaev B., et al. Development of a Frontal Plow for Smooth, Furless Plowing with Cutoffs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021;1030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1030/1/012135
9. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Tractor Plough with Repeated Cutting Angle on Working Elements. Procedia Engineering. 2017;206:1577–1582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.680
10. Tarasenko B., Drobot V., Troyanovskaya I., et al. Research and Development of a Combined Unit for Tillage with a Layer Turnover. Journal of Terramechanics. 2022;99:29–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.11.002
11. Syromyatnikov Y., Troyanovskaya I., Voinash S., et al. Productivity of Tillage Loosening and Separating Machines in an Aggregate with Tractors of Various Capacities. Journal of Terramechanics. 2021;98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.09.002
12. Mahatale Y.V., Tathod D.V., Chavan V.K. Performance of Reversible Mold Board Plow. In: M.R. Goyal (ed.). Emerging Technologies in Agricultural Engineering. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2017. p. 137–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315366364
13. Chandra Mouli K., Arunkumar S., Satwik B., et al. Design of Reversible Plough Attachment. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018;5(11):23702–23709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.160
14. Song Y., Chang B., Jin G., et al. Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of a Novel Constraint Metamorphic Reversible Plough. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019;2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8370827
15. He Y., Hu C., Yang Q., et al. Optimal Design of the Surface of the High-Speed Reversible Plow. INMATEH – Agricultural Engineering. 2022;66(1):81–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-66-08
16. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Moldboard Surface Universalization of the Ploughshare Operating Unit. Procedia Engineering. 2016;150:1297–1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.297
17. Borisenko I.B., Pavlenko V.I., Kondakov S.Y., et. al. [Tillage Implement]. Patent 2,399,177 Russian Federation. 2010 September 20. (In Russ.)
18. Mishurov N.P., Sviridova S.A., Petukhov D.A., et al. Evaluation of the Efficiency of Two-Row Disc Harrows to Be Used Along with Energy-Intensive Tractors. Machinery and Equipment for the Village. 2021;3:45–48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.33267/2072-9642-2021-3-45-48
19. Medovnik A.N., Tarasenko B.F., Tverdokhlebov S.A. [Tillage Apparatus]. Patent 2,298,302 Russian Federation. 2007 October 5. (In Russ.)
20. Tarasenko B.F., Orlenko S.Y., Dmitriev, D.A., et al. [Mounted Disco-Chisel Harrow]. Patent 206,472 Russian Federation. 2021. (In Russ.)
21. Tarasenko B.F., Orlenko S.Y., Kuzmin V.V. Universal Tillage Unit. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/3/032092
22. Tarasenko B.F., Romanov S.Y., Orlenko S.Y., et al. [Plow with Swivel Beam]. Patent 193,872 Russian Federation. 2019. (In Russ.)
23. Tarasenko B.F., Romanov S.Y., Orlenko S.Y., et al. [Harrow with Rotary Disc Section]. Patent 207,705 Russian Federation. 2021. (In Russ.)
24. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Analytical Model of the Technological Process of Soil Pulverization and Tillage Tools. Procedia Engineering. 2015;129:69–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.010
25. Saleh H., Hasanah S.I., Subaidi A. Implementation of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) in Experiments Factorial Two Factors (Study: Growth and Development of Soybean Germination). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012013
26. Loughin T.M., Johnson D.E., Ives S.E., Nagaraja T.G. Methods for Selecting Crossover Designs with Applications to an Experiment with Two Factors in a Split Plot. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 2002;7(2):143–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1198/10857110260141201
27. Rohan V.M., Jones G. Efficient Run Orders for a Two-Factor Response Surface Experiment on a Correlated Process. Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation. 2000;29(3):593–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920008832504
2. Shevnikov M., Milenko O., Lotysh I., et al. The Productivity of Soybeans Depending on the Conditions of Moisture Supply to the Soil. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021;9(4):211–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210904.17
3. Acharya B.S., Dodla S., Gaston L.A., et al. Winter Cover Crops Effect on Soil Moisture and Soybean Growth and Yield under Different Tillage Systems. Soil and Tillage Research. 2019;195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104430
4. Cherenkov A.V., Shevchenko M.S., Gyrka A.D. et al. Increasing the Efficiency of Moisture Resources in Crop Rotation by Tillage Optimization in Ukrainian Steppe Zone. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2021;11(2):35–39. Available at: https://clck.ru/33GrJe (accessed 01.12.2022).
5. Lobachevsky Y.P., Liskin I.V., Panov A.I., et al. Ploughing Quality and Energy Consumption Depending on Plough Bodies Type. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021;1030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1030/1/012154
6. Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Tractor Plough Designing with Specified Tillage Quality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012119
7. Aldoshin N., Kurbanov S., Abdullaev A., et al. Parameters of the Angle-Lift of the Front Plow for Smooth, Rowless Plowing. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021;264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126404042
8. Mamatov F., Aldoshin N., Mirzaev B., et al. Development of a Frontal Plow for Smooth, Furless Plowing with Cutoffs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2021;1030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1030/1/012135
9. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Tractor Plough with Repeated Cutting Angle on Working Elements. Procedia Engineering. 2017;206:1577–1582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.680
10. Tarasenko B., Drobot V., Troyanovskaya I., et al. Research and Development of a Combined Unit for Tillage with a Layer Turnover. Journal of Terramechanics. 2022;99:29–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.11.002
11. Syromyatnikov Y., Troyanovskaya I., Voinash S., et al. Productivity of Tillage Loosening and Separating Machines in an Aggregate with Tractors of Various Capacities. Journal of Terramechanics. 2021;98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.09.002
12. Mahatale Y.V., Tathod D.V., Chavan V.K. Performance of Reversible Mold Board Plow. In: M.R. Goyal (ed.). Emerging Technologies in Agricultural Engineering. New York: Apple Academic Press; 2017. p. 137–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315366364
13. Chandra Mouli K., Arunkumar S., Satwik B., et al. Design of Reversible Plough Attachment. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018;5(11):23702–23709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.160
14. Song Y., Chang B., Jin G., et al. Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of a Novel Constraint Metamorphic Reversible Plough. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019;2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8370827
15. He Y., Hu C., Yang Q., et al. Optimal Design of the Surface of the High-Speed Reversible Plow. INMATEH – Agricultural Engineering. 2022;66(1):81–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-66-08
16. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Moldboard Surface Universalization of the Ploughshare Operating Unit. Procedia Engineering. 2016;150:1297–1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.297
17. Borisenko I.B., Pavlenko V.I., Kondakov S.Y., et. al. [Tillage Implement]. Patent 2,399,177 Russian Federation. 2010 September 20. (In Russ.)
18. Mishurov N.P., Sviridova S.A., Petukhov D.A., et al. Evaluation of the Efficiency of Two-Row Disc Harrows to Be Used Along with Energy-Intensive Tractors. Machinery and Equipment for the Village. 2021;3:45–48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.33267/2072-9642-2021-3-45-48
19. Medovnik A.N., Tarasenko B.F., Tverdokhlebov S.A. [Tillage Apparatus]. Patent 2,298,302 Russian Federation. 2007 October 5. (In Russ.)
20. Tarasenko B.F., Orlenko S.Y., Dmitriev, D.A., et al. [Mounted Disco-Chisel Harrow]. Patent 206,472 Russian Federation. 2021. (In Russ.)
21. Tarasenko B.F., Orlenko S.Y., Kuzmin V.V. Universal Tillage Unit. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019;666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/3/032092
22. Tarasenko B.F., Romanov S.Y., Orlenko S.Y., et al. [Plow with Swivel Beam]. Patent 193,872 Russian Federation. 2019. (In Russ.)
23. Tarasenko B.F., Romanov S.Y., Orlenko S.Y., et al. [Harrow with Rotary Disc Section]. Patent 207,705 Russian Federation. 2021. (In Russ.)
24. Blednykh V.V., Svechnikov P.G., Troyanovskaya I.P. Analytical Model of the Technological Process of Soil Pulverization and Tillage Tools. Procedia Engineering. 2015;129:69–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.010
25. Saleh H., Hasanah S.I., Subaidi A. Implementation of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) in Experiments Factorial Two Factors (Study: Growth and Development of Soybean Germination). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012013
26. Loughin T.M., Johnson D.E., Ives S.E., Nagaraja T.G. Methods for Selecting Crossover Designs with Applications to an Experiment with Two Factors in a Split Plot. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 2002;7(2):143–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1198/10857110260141201
27. Rohan V.M., Jones G. Efficient Run Orders for a Two-Factor Response Surface Experiment on a Correlated Process. Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation. 2000;29(3):593–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920008832504
Опубликован
2023-03-22
Раздел
Агроинженерия
